Starch Sugar Makers Fined 747.6 Billion Won for Price-Fixing Scheme

Four Starch Sugar Firms: Daesang, Sajo, Samyang, CJ CheilJedang Plotted Price Hikes in Group Chat While Tariffs Cut to 0% FTC Slaps 747.6 Billion Won in Fines on Four Colluding Firms Also Orders Prices Reset to Pre-Collusion Levels Follow-Up Probes Could Push Total Fines Past 1 Trillion Won

Finance|
|
By Kim Nam-myung
||
Nam Dong-il, vice chairman of the Fair Trade Commission, briefs on the ruling in the starch and starch sugar price-fixing case at the Government Complex in Sejong on the 7th. - Seoul Economic Daily Finance News from South Korea
Nam Dong-il, vice chairman of the Fair Trade Commission, briefs on the ruling in the starch and starch sugar price-fixing case at the Government Complex in Sejong on the 7th.

An organized price-fixing scheme lasting about eight years has been uncovered in the starch and starch sugar market, a sector supplying essential sweetening ingredients for beverages, bread and snacks. Although the government even waived import tariffs to rein in consumer prices, major manufacturers raised prices behind the scenes to reap excessive profits — and now face the largest fine in the history of collusion cases.

The Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said Friday it will impose corrective orders and a combined 747.6 billion won in fines on four companies — Daesang, Sajo CPK, Samyang, and CJ CheilJedang — which together hold roughly an 80% monopoly of the domestic starch sugar market, and will refer all of the corporations to prosecutors. The fine is the largest ever in a collusion case. By company, Daesang, which has the highest market share, was hit hardest with around 280 billion won, followed by Sajo CPK (in the 190 billion won range), Samyang (in the 150 billion won range), and CJ CheilJedang (in the 120 billion won range).

According to the FTC investigation, the companies jointly planned the timing of price increases and decreases on 13 occasions over seven years and five months, from May 2018 to October 2025, through meetings at the sales division head level and regular gatherings of working-level staff, as well as a permanently open KakaoTalk group chat.

Their collusion grew especially intense as international grain prices fluctuated amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. Even though the government lowered the quota tariff applied to processing corn to 0% to ease the food industry's cost burden, the companies pocketed the benefit while passing on the full cost increases to their clients. Conversely, when international grain prices stabilized, they secured unfair gains by systematically delaying price cuts or minimizing their scale. As a result, starch sugar selling prices soared by as much as 73% compared with before the collusion began, and the related sales the four companies generated during this period reached 6.0525 trillion won.

In response, the FTC issued not only fines but also an "independent price re-determination order" forcing the companies to restore prices — which had been artificially driven up by the collusion — to their original level, that is, the level before the collusion. Under this measure, the fourth such order in FTC history, the companies must mandatorily report price changes to the FTC every half-year for the next three years. Nam Dong-il, vice chairman of the FTC, explained that it was "an extraordinary measure to completely resolve the market price system distorted by long-running collusion."

The FTC's blade is expected to cut deeper into the food industry. Separately from this price-fixing action, the FTC has simultaneously launched review procedures into a "bid-rigging" case (related sales of 940 billion won), in which the winning bidder and bidding prices were prearranged in tenders placed by seven major food companies, and a "byproduct price-fixing" case (related sales of 1.55 trillion won), in which the prices of feed raw materials such as protein skin were controlled.

The related sales in these follow-up cases alone amount to 2.5 trillion won, and if the maximum statutory ceiling fine of 20% is imposed at a future plenary session, additional fines alone could approach up to 500 billion won. As a result, the total fines that major food companies will pay over this starch sugar affair could exceed 1.2 trillion won for the first time based on a single product category. The final decision on sanctions and the scale of fines will be confirmed after a future plenary session review.

null - Seoul Economic Daily Finance News from South Korea

Companies in this story

Original reporting by Kim Nam-myung for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
3:12

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Now live
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

SIGNAL English Edition is live — Korea's deal desk reporting in English. M&A, IPOs, private equity and fund flows, covered daily for global institutional investors. Browse free; subscriber-only scoops at the 50% intro rate.