Constitutional Court to Review Tax Ruling on Disability Support Agency

Society|
|
By Kim Sung-taekim@sedaily.com
||
A flag flutters in the wind at the Constitutional Court in Jongno-gu, Seoul. Yonhap News - Seoul Economic Daily Society News from South Korea
A flag flutters in the wind at the Constitutional Court in Jongno-gu, Seoul. Yonhap News

A petition seeking to overturn court rulings that upheld a local tax levied on a disability activity support agency has passed the Constitutional Court's preliminary screening.

The Constitutional Court said on the 9th that a three-justice panel referred the case, filed by an agency identified as A, to the full bench.

Agency A, an unincorporated association that dispatches personal assistants and provides peer counseling, has operated an activity support agency under the Act on Support for Persons with Disabilities. The Jongno District Office determined that the agency did not qualify as a social welfare corporation eligible for a local tax exemption between January 2020 and January 2022, and imposed 25 separate levies of the employee-based local tax totaling about 40 million won, along with penalty taxes.

Disability activity support agencies had been exempt from the employee-based local tax, but a January 2020 revision to the Restriction of Special Local Taxation Act created a legal basis for taxing them. The government revised the law again in March 2023 to exempt the employee-based local tax from that point onward.

Agency A filed a suit to cancel the tax assessment. The suit was dismissed in the first and second trials, and the Supreme Court ruled against the agency in May this year. The agency then filed a constitutional petition with the Constitutional Court seeking to overturn the first-instance, appellate and Supreme Court rulings. The agency argued that the rulings, by finding the local tax assessment lawful under statutory provisions that violate the constitutional principle of tax equality, run counter to the principle of substantive taxation, the social state principle, the duty to protect persons with disabilities and the principle of proportionality, and infringe on basic rights including the right to equality and property rights.

Since the introduction of constitutional petitions against court rulings, 19 cases have been referred to the full bench. Of the 2,126 such petitions filed as of the previous day, 1,973 were dismissed.

Original reporting by Kim Sung-tae for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
3:12

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Now live
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

SIGNAL English Edition is live — Korea's deal desk reporting in English. M&A, IPOs, private equity and fund flows, covered daily for global institutional investors. Browse free; subscriber-only scoops at the 50% intro rate.