Tech CEOs Persuade Trump to Block AI Regulatory Body

Concerns Over Entrenched Dominance of OpenAI, Anthropic and Google White House and Administration Also Split Over AI Regulation

International|
|
By Kim Jung-wookmykj@sedaily.com
||
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (left) and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speak during the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., in November last year. AP-Yonhap - Seoul Economic Daily International News from South Korea
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (left) and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speak during the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., in November last year. AP-Yonhap

The heads of Silicon Valley's biggest technology companies — Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk — successively lobbied U.S. President Donald Trump and blocked the creation of a regulatory body for the artificial intelligence industry.

The Wall Street Journal reported on the 17th, citing multiple sources, that the three CEOs each contacted Trump separately in recent weeks to voice opposition to the proposed body and ultimately succeeded in derailing the discussions.

What they opposed was a private-sector-led AI regulatory and standard-setting body proposed by Demis Hassabis, Google's chief scientist. According to the sources, the three CEOs argued that such a body could concentrate power in the three leading developers — OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. They also raised complaints about who would fill key posts, including executive positions at the body.

The three, who held one-on-one conversations with Trump in turn over recent weeks, are said to have expressed a preference for the "light-touch regulation" the current administration has adopted.

Views on AI regulation are also sharply divided inside the White House. Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross favor stronger AI oversight frameworks and guidelines. David Sacks, who chairs the president's council of advisers on science and technology, has consistently pressed Trump to adopt a minimal-regulation approach.

Trump ultimately came down on the side of accelerating AI, writing on his social media platform Truth Social that pathological conspiracy theories were spreading around AI and data centers and that China was the only party that welcomed such a situation. Trump is scheduled to meet AI company executives next week to discuss the industry's responsibility for AI safety and, if necessary, government regulation.

The U.S. AI industry, meanwhile, has split into opposing camps since Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei raised the need to slow the pace of development. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Hassabis have leaned toward Amodei's position, while Huang and Zuckerberg have taken the opposite side.

At a recent Salesforce event, Huang said safety was the top priority but also an engineering problem to be solved, arguing that speed and safety can coexist. Zuckerberg also opposed setting up an AI regulatory body, saying individual companies have the capacity to set and observe an appropriate pace of development on their own, without outside regulation.

Musk expressed sympathy with Amodei's argument, but the AI operation he leads has never actually put forward a concrete plan on development pace.

Original reporting by Kim Jung-wook for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
4:38
World News Day 2026 — Know the facts. Understand what matters. #ChooseTrustedJournalism

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Now live
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

SIGNAL English Edition is live — Korea's deal desk reporting in English. M&A, IPOs, private equity and fund flows, covered daily for global institutional investors. Browse free; subscriber-only scoops at the 50% intro rate.