Democrats Say Chief Justice Overrode Court Officials on Nominee

Party claims Jo Hee-de reversed judicial administration office's recommendation to renominate Supreme Court justices also caught off guard, in what party calls unprecedented abuse of authority Democrats to press for answers at Judiciary Committee session on the 28th

Politics|
|
By Noh Hae-cheolsun@sedaily.com
||
President Lee Jae-myung attends a meeting of senior presidential aides and secretaries at Cheong Wa Dae on Nov. 21 (left photo). Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de arrives for work at the Supreme Court building on Nov. 22. Jo rejected Lee's demand to renominate candidates for Supreme Court justice, putting the president and the judiciary in a head-on clash. Kwon Wook, Newsl - Seoul Economic Daily Politics News from South Korea
President Lee Jae-myung attends a meeting of senior presidential aides and secretaries at Cheong Wa Dae on Nov. 21 (left photo). Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de arrives for work at the Supreme Court building on Nov. 22. Jo rejected Lee's demand to renominate candidates for Supreme Court justice, putting the president and the judiciary in a head-on clash. Kwon Wook, Newsl

The Democratic Party of Korea alleged that Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de personally overturned a recommendation by the National Court Administration to submit a new nomination for a Supreme Court justice. The party called it "a grave matter that could constitute abuse of authority" and said it would pursue a parliamentary investigation.

Lee Yong-woo, the party's spokesperson, said at a press conference at the National Assembly on the 27th that "the National Court Administration initially concluded that a new nomination should be submitted, and its director reported this to Chief Justice Jo, but Jo flew into a rage and instructed that the position be redrafted as a refusal to renominate, on the grounds that the original nomination remained valid."

Lee said the administration's director "confided that it was the first time he had seen Chief Justice Jo so enraged, and the Supreme Court justices had been inclined to think that submitting a new nomination would suffice, so they could not hide their bewilderment at Jo's unexpected decision to refuse."

"If this is true, this episode amounts to personnel manipulation by an imperial chief justice and a grave matter that could constitute abuse of authority, in which an unprecedented display of rage was used to force a change in the court's interpretation of the Constitution," Lee said. "This episode also symbolically demonstrates the need for a judicial administration organization independent of the chief justice."

Addressing Jo directly, Lee asked whether he had "ignored the National Court Administration's recommendation to renominate and ordered the position be redrafted as a refusal," whether he had "formally gathered the views of the Supreme Court justices," and whether "the phone calls pressuring the justice candidates to withdraw were also made on Jo's instructions."

The Democratic Party plans to hold an emergency questioning session at the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee on the 28th to focus on the reasons for and the process behind Jo's refusal to submit a new nomination. Lee urged that Jo "not hide cowardly behind the director of the National Court Administration, but appear before the National Assembly in person and reveal the truth about this refusal," and called on the administration to "immediately submit to the National Assembly the documents the Assembly has requested — the review document on the recommendation to renominate, and the review document on the refusal that was reportedly redrafted after the report to Chief Justice Jo."

Jo had nominated Son Bong-gi, a senior judge at the Daegu District Court, as a Supreme Court justice candidate on the 18th of last month without separate consultation with the presidential office. Ten days later, the presidential office demanded a new nomination, saying it had been a written nomination made without substantive consultation. On the 22nd, Jo said he could not accept the demand, stating that he "could find no specific constitutional grounds or reasons to justify a new nomination."

Original reporting by Noh Hae-cheol for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
2:34
World News Day 2026 — Know the facts. Understand what matters. #ChooseTrustedJournalism

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Now live
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

SIGNAL English Edition is live — Korea's deal desk reporting in English. M&A, IPOs, private equity and fund flows, covered daily for global institutional investors. Browse free; subscriber-only scoops at the 50% intro rate.